Bioenergy CCS
too little, too expensive, and not net negative
Author: Fredrik Lundberg
This briefing was published by AirClim.
Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) is often promoted as a pathway to achieve "negative emissions." However, as highlighted in AirClim's briefing, the reality is far less promising. BECCS comes with high economic and environmental costs, from land use conflicts to biodiversity loss, and significant technical challenges.
BECCS is just one of many "negative emissions" options, such as Direct Air Capture CCS (DACCS) or enhanced weathering of alkaline rocks, which will hardly deliver any climate benefits within the urgent timeframes needed, despite the hype generated by their proponents. On the contrary, nature-based methods such as wetland and mangrove restoration and reforestation, offer proven and effective ways to absorb and store carbon in trees and soil.
Read AirClim's briefing to learn why BECCS may be more of a costly distraction than a real climate solution.
The views and opinions expressed in the publication are those of the mentioned organisation and do not necessarily reflect the position of all Real Zero Europe members.